Make ppc64 secondary arch - don't block builds (was: Dealing with ppc64 BRs)
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Mon Aug 6 16:42:30 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating writes:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:16:06 +0100
> Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Bugs found when chasing down portability problems are often real
> > bugs, not just non-portable code. For that reason, 100% of our
> > users benefit from portable code, not just the 1% who use minor
> > architectures. It's in everyone's interest that Fedora code is
> > real C (or C++).
>
> But when that bug doesn't effect the majority of our user base,
How do you know until you have analyzed the bug? Every bug revealed
during portability testing is potentially a real bug on the primary
arch.
> do those users really care? Should the? Yes. Do they? No. "It
> works for me and my major arch, why should I care that it broke on
> your silly arch?"
You are painfully close to assuming that our users are fools; I don't
believe it.
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list