GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Aug 16 14:25:01 UTC 2007
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:06:00 +0200
Tomas Janousek <tjanouse at redhat.com> wrote:
> If COPYING does not signal licensing intent, why "any version of the
> GPL", why not "unknown license, if any" ?
An unmodified COPYING file from FSF contains:
"If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation."
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070816/ad875a71/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list