Jpackage: follow or lead?
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Tue Aug 21 14:32:02 UTC 2007
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:20:31 -0600
"Jerry James" <loganjerry at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to get findbugs into Fedora. Findbugs can optionally use ASM
> instead of BCEL. I would like to get ASM into Fedora first, then, so
> we don't have any pesky options that don't work. Jpackage.org has an
> ASM package already; two of them in fact. The package named "asm"
> contains version 1.5.3, and the package named "asm2" contains version
> 2.1. However, the current ASM release is version 3.0 (as of November
> 2006). Should I follow jpackage.org and go with an "asm2" package
> until they release a version 3, or should I cut to the chase and
> create a version 3 package for Fedora? In the latter case, I presume
> it should be named "asm3" and have a version number containing "jpp";
> is there any reason to do otherwise? Thanks,
asm2 is already in Fedora. It's just never been built. It's owner is
Permaine Cheung (pcheung).
josh
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list