This list isn't working out. Or, why do we have fedora-devel and fedora-maintainers

[Roland Wolters]

Once upon a time Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Roland Wolters wrote:
> > Well, I would totally agree with that - however, once or twice in
> > the past I actually had questions regarding the maintaining of
> > packages. And -devel is *no* option for me, I just don't have time
> > to deal with that.
> >
> > So what should people like me (maintaining just a few packages) do?
>
> You could subscribe to fedora-devel-announce and fedora-devel-list.
> Set your fedora-devel subscription to nomail so that you can still
> post there (I'm assuming posting it restricted to subscribers, but if
> I wasn't so lazy I'd verify that).  That way you can still ask the
> occasional question that you might have and then just check the
> archives for replies (and/or ask to be CC:d).

Hm, nice idea, thanks :)

Roland

-- 
"Aus Anonymitätsgründen nennen wir sie Lisa S. Oder nein,
doch lieber L. Simpson."
						-- Schuldirektor Skinner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070822/fde9ee60/attachment.sig>