Merge Review: libgpod

[Denis Leroy]

Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Denis Leroy wrote:
>> The package seems to deal with two different tarballs, and generate
>> libgpod (0.4.2) and compat-libgpod (0.3.2) from the same spec file.
>>
>> This is somewhat unusual, should this get review approval ? I would
>> prefer if the package were split in two personally.
> 
> The compat-libgpod package is only generated for FC6 and isn't part of
> the F7/devel branch.  I did the review on the devel branch only, as it
> seemed to me that the other branches weren't relevant for the purposes
> of the merge.  Is that not the case?
> 
> I was the one who submitted the changes to Alex for the compat-libgpod
> package in the FC6 spec.  I believe Alex suggested that since it was
> going to be short-lived there wasn't too much reason to make it a
> separate package.  I'm not sure what the policy or standard practice
> is regarding compat- packages.  Pointers and examples would be
> welcome, of course, even if it's not totally relevant in this case.
> 
> BTW, apologies for not adding a link to the bug in my previous post.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022

I'm sorry, yes i was looking at the fc-6 spec file. The devel spec file 
looks much better. Review looks good to me.