ACL's, Why a Big Deal?

[Callum Lerwick]

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:32 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> 1) For all existing packages, pkg.acl file does not exist.  So the 
> openness that existed previously DID NOT CHANGE.
> 
> 2) For newly added packages, pkg.acl exists by default.  If you as an 
> owner don't want such protectionism, just cvs remove it.
> 
> 3) Owners have the *OPTION* to use a pkg.acl file to grant specific 
> other users access to a locked down package.

Whats the big deal? Its the camel's nose in the tent, enabling selfish
territorialism.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070208/faa08542/attachment.sig>