Eliminate "Bouncing" in Reviews

[Tomas Mraz]

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 08:53 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:25:25AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> Because at this point the reviewer is done.  I no longer want to see things on 
> >> this bug, I'm done with the review, it is now in the hands of the packager to 
> >> finish the work.  But *shrug* I don't really care either way.
> > 
> > How is it possible to determine who reviewed the bug, in that case?
> 
> Good point, currently Extras'periodically gathers review statistics, and 
> "reviewer" statistics are based on who's assigned (afaik).  If that 
> changes, as Patrice points out, it will be different/more-difficult to 
> determine that.
Not so much more difficult - just who gave the + flag is the reviewer
isn't it?
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb