Problems with core review

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Feb 8 16:33:58 UTC 2007


On Thursday 08 February 2007 11:13, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The resistance you run into is a strong hint that the packaging committee
> ought to keep this issue out of the policies. Strong language doesn't help
> it. And you are right, the desire to force packagers into macro-madness
> and less readable spec files is "silly".

Well, given that it is an rpmlint check, we should have wording on the wiki 
that explains why use of it is discouraged (can hurt builds from non-clean 
buildroots) and what forms of it are "acceptable".

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070208/126ac69c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list