RFC: Review with Flags (Version 4)

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 08.02.2007 14:28, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:26:51AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On Thursday 08 February 2007 02:56, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> Who gets to decide on what the final procedure will be. Currently the
> >>> decission making process is very unclear. Thus FESCO get to vote on
> >>> this, or some other committee?
> >> I'm all for FESCO making this decision.
> > That's fine,
> 
> /me agrees that it's a decision for FESCo
> 
> /me at the same time really wonders why the wiki document where this 
> needs to be integrated is protected by restricting ACLs of the Packaging 
> Committee
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
> That would indicate that it would be stuff for the Packaging Committee. 
> But they want to concentrate around Packaging, and not Policies or 
> Review stuff afaik

More appropriate, IMHO, is to break out the part of that document which
describes the review process and put it outside the Packaging/ section.
Then, that document can simply point to the review process, say,
wiki/ReviewProcess .

~spot