Review question about /var/log/* files.

Phil Knirsch pknirsch at redhat.com
Fri Feb 9 14:37:02 UTC 2007


Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 08:53, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>> What about the rotated files?
>>> If you know their exact names ..., why not also %ghost them?
>> The local admin could have made changes to the logrotate rules.
> 
> Right, that was my point in mentioning rotated logs. The admin could have set 
> the number of kept logs to 20. So, the question is why should 1 file be 
> ghosted when you have this open ended rotate question?
> 

Thats a real good point. No package pwning^H^H^H^H^H^H owning any 
logfiles in /var/log/ sounds more and more reasonable. Directories there 
are a different matter as they clearly are connected to a specific package.

Read ya, Phil

-- 
Philipp Knirsch      | Tel.:  +49-711-96437-470
Development          | Fax.:  +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH         | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil at redhat.de>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web:   http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
Motd:  You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list