Review question about /var/log/* files.
Phil Knirsch
pknirsch at redhat.com
Fri Feb 9 14:37:02 UTC 2007
Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 08:53, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>> What about the rotated files?
>>> If you know their exact names ..., why not also %ghost them?
>> The local admin could have made changes to the logrotate rules.
>
> Right, that was my point in mentioning rotated logs. The admin could have set
> the number of kept logs to 20. So, the question is why should 1 file be
> ghosted when you have this open ended rotate question?
>
Thats a real good point. No package pwning^H^H^H^H^H^H owning any
logfiles in /var/log/ sounds more and more reasonable. Directories there
are a different matter as they clearly are connected to a specific package.
Read ya, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Development | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil at redhat.de>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
Motd: You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list