Odd licenses

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi,

I'm currently trying to do to the merge review for adaptx [1] but the
license field is troubling:

Exolab Software License

A google query gives this page (in the cache):

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:kh3l7BHsrJsJ:freshmeat.net/releases/3417/+exolab+osi&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us&lr=lang_en|lang_fr&client=firefox-a

Which seems to imply that the license [2] is BSD.  It does indeed look
quite BSD-ish to me but what should the license field have?  Is this
okay from a legal standpoint?  Spot?

Thanks,

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070209/930d80b2/attachment.sig>