VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 3)
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Tue Feb 13 01:44:38 UTC 2007
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> +1 from me. The only question I'd have is whether it would be
> feasible to use Fedora account system IDs instead of email addresses
> for those who don't want to expose their addresses. (Those who insist
> on using a different address in bugzilla and the account system would
> just have to deal, of course.)
>
I agree it would be superior to use the FAS account names everywhere,
and have services that need something different to need to deal with it
somehow. (Currently we have a tiny hard-coded e-mail to e-mail mapping
in the ACL handling code.)
This however would be another change to existing code that is live.
With other big changes happening, I don't know if it is wise to change
this many things at once?
A counter-argument however would be... does only owners.list -> CVS ACL
use the Bugzilla address and nothing else? If so, why not change it now
before this new policy goes live.
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list