Reviewer as Enforcer (ASSIGNED)

[Warren Togami]

Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> And... it is obvious that the person who _mainly_ has
> to take action after the review passed is the submitter,
> isn't it? Moreover I think that setting assingee as
> reviewer, which explicitly shows the person who reviewed
> the bug, makes it easier to trace the reviewes
> _afterwards_ by bugzilla query or some other methods.

I see.  You see the role of the reviewer as an "enforcer", who is
responsible to being sure that a review goes through to the end.  Even
after fedora-review+, the reviewer remains ASSIGNED and accountable,
able to follow-up if necessary.

OK, I am convinced.  ASSIGNED to reviewer (and stays that way) is the
best we can do within limitations of our current tools.

I guess another draft ensues...

Warren