RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Tue Feb 20 20:01:39 UTC 2007


On Dienstag 20 Februar 2007, Warren Togami wrote:

> Remove the use of FE-NEW, FE-REVIEW, and FE-ACCEPT.

For this fedora-review{BLANK,?,+} would be enough and when it is not needed to 
change the blocking bugs anymore, it does not make it more complicated, than 
it is now. Is there als an advantage of using "fedora-review-" instead of 
only using "NEEDINFO" when someone has to do something? And does assigning 
to "nobody at fedoraproject.org" or the reviewer instead of 
using "fedora-review{BLANK,?}" and changing to "CLOSED RAWHIDE" instead of 
fedora-review+ not scale, too? I think it is odd to mark the state of a 
ticket with two ways which both need to be done manually, when only one may 
be sufficient.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070220/602e91ad/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list