RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Tue Feb 20 20:01:39 UTC 2007
On Dienstag 20 Februar 2007, Warren Togami wrote:
> Remove the use of FE-NEW, FE-REVIEW, and FE-ACCEPT.
For this fedora-review{BLANK,?,+} would be enough and when it is not needed to
change the blocking bugs anymore, it does not make it more complicated, than
it is now. Is there als an advantage of using "fedora-review-" instead of
only using "NEEDINFO" when someone has to do something? And does assigning
to "nobody at fedoraproject.org" or the reviewer instead of
using "fedora-review{BLANK,?}" and changing to "CLOSED RAWHIDE" instead of
fedora-review+ not scale, too? I think it is odd to mark the state of a
ticket with two ways which both need to be done manually, when only one may
be sufficient.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070220/602e91ad/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list