RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

[Christian Iseli]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:45:15 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> This procedure is meant to be for *BOTH* Merge and regular package 
> reviews.  Please comment.

I mostly like it.  My only gripe is about the toggling between
fedora-review? and fedora-review-

I do not think it brings much.  I'd prefer the flag to stay at ?
(corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED
BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved.

I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW
(#201449), or some similar purpose.

					C