RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

[Jesse Keating]

On Tuesday 20 February 2007 17:44, Christian Iseli wrote:
> I do not think it brings much.  I'd prefer the flag to stay at ?
> (corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED
> BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved.
>
> I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW
> (#201449), or some similar purpose.

+1

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070220/c49764d1/attachment.sig>