RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

[Chris Weyl]

On 2/20/07, Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli at licr.org> wrote:
> I mostly like it.  My only gripe is about the toggling between
> fedora-review? and fedora-review-
>
> I do not think it brings much.  I'd prefer the flag to stay at ?
> (corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED
> BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved.
>
> I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW
> (#201449), or some similar purpose.

Strong +1.  There doesn't seem to be much constantly flipping flag
states can do that a judicious use of needinfo can't.

                   -Chris

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia