RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

[Hans de Goede]

Christian Iseli wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:45:15 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
>> This procedure is meant to be for *BOTH* Merge and regular package 
>> reviews.  Please comment.
> 
> I mostly like it.  My only gripe is about the toggling between
> fedora-review? and fedora-review-
> 
> I do not think it brings much.  I'd prefer the flag to stay at ?
> (corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED
> BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved.
> 
> I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW
> (#201449), or some similar purpose.
> 

+1, if not +100, this toggling between fedora-review? and fedora-review- 
is totally unnecesarry as heen be said by me and several others several 
times already, why o why is noone listening, or atleast explaining why 
this is actually necessary?

Regards,

Hans