Future owners/ACL choices

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Toshio Kuratomi schrieb:
> notting and I are in agreement that Commit, packagedb ACLs, and
> notifications will be requested by user and approved by package owner
> (I'm thinking of auto-approving watchbugzilla and watchcommits but I
> hadn't mentioned that before.)  We disagree about ownership.

My 2 cent: "Queue and ACK" the owner for new and freshly imported
packages as well as orphaned packages, but "at will" for existing
packages. The latter *maybe* "at will" only for the primary maintainer,
so only he can add co-maintainers or hand over maintainership to
somebody else.

Cu
thl