Extras Buildsys

Kevin Fenzi kevin at tummy.com
Mon Jan 1 19:32:37 UTC 2007


On 01 Jan 2007 12:58:50 -0600
tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) wrote:

> >>>>> "DG" == Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> writes:
> 
> DG> Just a note to all, the buildsys no longer accepts jobs for Extras
> DG> for FC-3 and FC-4
> 
> Since that's the case, perhaps we could trim FC3 and FC4 from the EVR
> problem report.  There now seems to be no possibility of fixing those
> issues.

Yeah, that leaves us with in extras: 

andreas.bierfert AT lowlatency.de:
    wine-docs
      FE3 > FE4 (0:0.9.27-1.fc3 > 0:0.9.24-1.fc4)

In core there is: 

    device-mapper
      FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2)

    lvm2
      FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1)

    mozilla
      FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy >
37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4) FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy >
37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5)

    xen
      FC5-updates > FC6-updates (0:3.0.3-2.fc5 > 0:3.0.3-1.fc6)

> 
> I think we got all of the FC3 and FC4 broken rep's fixed, so there
> shouldn't be problems with that report.

Yeah, none there that I know of. 
> 
>  - J<

Two other end of life issues someone needs to address: 

- Is someone going to close all the legacy/FE/FC <5 bugs in bugzilla? 

Looks like there are 77 or so for fe3/fe4.
Around 841 in fc1/fc2/fc3/fc4
Around 107 in legacy. 

- I seem to remember that the infrastructure team was for some reason
using some fc/fe3 packages on the builders or other infrastructure
machines. Can we make sure those get branched/maintained for epel and
any machines switched to those new packages? 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070101/f69af077/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list