EPEL Branches

[Chris Ricker]

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Tim Burke wrote:

> > Also, with the brave new world of Core and Extras merged, is it just
> > "anything in Fedora that's not in RHEL is fine for EPEL", or what?
> > 
> >   
> Perhaps a small distinction, but I think the definition is a little broader..
> ie a little more than RHEL... extending to the layered products.
> Specifically, I propose that EPEL is "FE stuff that RH doesn't otherwise ship
> that someone volunteers to do the work in EPEL".  That would preclude things
> like our cluster and directory server packages from simply being rebuilt and
> pushed in EPEL.

But how would that work? There's soon no FE, just F. And, for example, 
directory server will likely be in F at some point....

later,
chris