new features in package CVS
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Wed Jan 31 07:43:25 UTC 2007
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> writes:
>> Access is determined as follows:
>> No pkg.acl file: all are allowed access
>
> OK, but then the default for existing packages is to be wide open :-(.
> Or are you auto-creating empty pkg.acl file for all existing packages,
> as well as new imports? I hope the answer is yes, so we don't all have
> to scramble to close up our packages.
>
I for one don't mind my 98 (I really should get 2 more 100 sounds so
much better) packages being open. Up until now that has caused 0
problems and allowed other todo things like rebuilds for a new python
while I was busy/away.
I think having ACL's is good, but having them created as closed by
default is BAD.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list