Error output from rpm pre/post scripts (was Re: Florian La Roche please stop mass filing bugs)

[Florian La Roche]

> Well, I don't remember if I was involved in that, but if we don't want the 
> scriptlet to fail and don't want to display the error output (no matter 
> whether it's because of a missing executable or some other error running it), 
> dunno if checking first adds any value.

Hello Ville,

what's wrong with "if test -x app; then app; fi" for this?
Shouldn't this fix all problems?

regards,

Florian La Roche