foo vs. foo+
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sat Jul 21 09:50:35 UTC 2007
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:15:19AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Ok so far, but foo+ also needs a "Provides: foo", and I wonder if is
> > Provides: foo
> > Conflicts: foo
> > really is a good idea. And can/should we use versioned Provides: here?
> Unless I am wrong, yum (rpm) won't care about versioned Provides:, and
> replace foo+ with foo (I had such issues with libnet10/libnet).
Do you have a test case available where rpm/yum ignores the version?
More information about the Fedora-maintainers