foo vs. foo+

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at
Sun Jul 22 11:55:55 UTC 2007

On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:41:37PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >No, that's a different bug probably. If one of the virtual provides
> >was a real entity then you trigger another rpm bug that was tagged a
> >feature (check bugzilla for concurrent python of some sound libs from
> >ccrma for details, I don't have the bz# handy): It automatically
> >introduces silent Obsoletes ...
> FWIW, that particular "feature" is gone in rpm

Now that's what I call good news! :)

Wonder if this mis-feature removal could ever make it into RHEL. After
all it did break many sane assumptions of a couple ISVs already ...
Axel.Thimm at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list