gkrellm license change notificaition

[Ville Skyttä]

On Sunday 22 July 2007, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > Dunno.  When combined with v3 work (which I gather is what happens
> > when one compiles a gkrellm plugin against the new v3 gkrellm), it
> > would seem to me that the result is no longer distributable as v2.
> > If that's the case, saying "v2 or later" in the copyright notices
> > bundled with the distributable doesn't sound right to me.
>
> Why not?  I think it seems reasonable.

If the result is not distributable as v2 it is reasonable for us to say "v2 or 
later"?  Note that "v2 or later" includes v2.  Well, enough noise, let's just 
see what the board/legal/FESCO has to say about this.