Pushing updates for Fedora 7
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Sun Jun 3 14:07:05 UTC 2007
On Sunday 03 June 2007 10:07:45 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hence there must be strategies which deal with these situations.
> It is not acceptable that a user suffers from a broken dependency,
> which makes it impossible to update FF, while the packager who
> could fix the broken dep perhaps is on vacation, awol, whatever,
> and it takes days if not weeks to find out.
Sure. The current security team ideals is that a security team member can
step in and apply security fixes or rebuild dependent packages in the absence
of a maintainer. There needs to be a reasonable timeout though no? So there
may still be a window where the update gets released, and the fringe packages
are not updated to suit, until a timeout is reached and a security team
member has to step in and issue an update for the fringe package.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070603/bc717511/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list