Pushing updates for Fedora 7

[Mamoru Tasaka]

Jesse Keating wrote, at 06/03/2007 10:46 PM +9:00:
> On Sunday 03 June 2007 07:12:48 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> Security updates go straight to Stable already.
>> They shouldn't. They should undergo an automated procedure to assure
>> they fit cleanly into the existing installations and don't break package
>> deps.
> 
> This is not always practical.  Should a firefox remote exploit fix be held up 
> because a fringe package that builds against FF and is used by say 5 people 
> hasn't been rebuilt yet?  Should every use suffer?  I seriously hope not.

Well, while I feel now that I can hardly catch up with this
long thread, I leave one comment for this.

While I surely understand that we should take security updates
very important, please keep in mind that I hear on Fedora BBS 
(in Japan) about the strong complaint about dependency break more and 
more times than the delay of security related updates.

Regards,
Mamoru