Plan for tomorrow's (20070604) Release Engineering meeting

[Brian Pepple]

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 19:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Brian Pepple wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:08:23AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>> /topic RELENG-Meeting - Freeze Policy - JesseKeating
> >> I would suggest to consider at least one full rebuild [1] before the
> >> final freeze (e.g. as part of the pre-freeze process) and of course to
> >> allow for enough time between the freeze and the GA to shake out any
> >> bugs that will surface by that process.
> > 
> > This is on FESCo's schedule to discuss after F7 was released.
> 
> Note that this has caused mass confusion as I thought it would. It is 
> not just about technical requirements.
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-June/msg00048.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-June/msg01017.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00016.html

Wasn't it the case that most of these folks didn't read the release
notes?

>  
> Another reason to consider doing rebuilds
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01171.html

Did we ever get a list of the packages that were actually effected by
this?

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070604/062dc416/attachment.sig>