use disttag ".1" for devel to avoid confusion

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 04.06.2007 18:10, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>> The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still
> >>> stands.
> >>> The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a
> >>> package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is
> >>> a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no
> >>> need to got for "x.2".
> >>> I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested.
> >> I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this.  Just for 
> >> the record.
> > And it's just replacing .fc8, .fc9 with .1, .2, not really
> > helpful. Not to mention that it breaks all dotted releases.
> 
> No. As I wrote (and you quoted it; see above): "so there would no
> need to got for "x.2".

You either have F9 go ".2" (if F8 is ".1") or you would had killed the
usefulness of disttags altogether, so either way it's broken.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070604/ec518b45/attachment.sig>