Merge Review

[Brian Pepple]

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 02:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Brian Pepple wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:50 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> >> On 6/4/07, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> wrote:
> >>> Now that Fedora 7 is out the door, I'd like to ask what the plans are
> >>> for the big Merge Review.
> >>> There are still a lot of unassigned tickets, and I think all the
> >>> people working on the Review since january (thanks!) could use some
> >>> help.
> >>> Maybe we can do another Review Day before F-8?
> >> This is something I'd personally like to see FESCo address.  If memory
> >> serves, originally the intent of the merge reviews was to make sure
> >> core packages were reviewed and complied to guidelines like any other
> >> package.  As time wore on, for a variety of reasons the decision was
> >> made (by FESCo?) to treat the review tix as "advisory" and not
> >> blocking a package's inclusion in the Brave Merged World.
> > 
> > the plan is to have these bug be blockers for F8.
> 
> What happens when package reviews don't finish because the reviewers 
> don't review it or package maintainers fix up the packages? Do we pull 
> out packages (what if this was the kernel or glibc?) or delay release or 
> is there other ideas?

That is one of the items we are still discussing. 

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070604/ff0ed4f7/attachment.sig>