gprolog i386,i486,i586,i686 rpms?!?

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:24:53AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 08:34:32 Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I'm not referring to the fixed koji bug, but the ExclusiveArch
> > abuse. Semantically wrong field to embed this information, and this
> > information doesn't belong into specfiles or rpm headers anyway.
> >
> > But let's first get settled with the new tools and suggest
> > improvements later (not that plague did better in this respect).
> 
> Koji doesn't use this anymore.  Koji uses a field in the entry for that 
> package in the database to list the "extra arches" a package should build 
> for.  That triggers koji to issue multiple builds of the package when the 
> request comes in, one for each arch listed.  Using ExclusiveArch was an 
> attempt at doing away from this manual configuration per package with Extra 
> arches and rely upon information provided by the spec, but it had undesired 
> side-effects.

That's wonderful news! If you would also pass over how this is being
taught to koji you'd make my day. :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070613/f59d321e/attachment.sig>