gprolog i386,i486,i586,i686 rpms?!?

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 13 June 2007 11:49:56 Quentin Spencer wrote:
> The atlas package could benefit from this. It provides speed-optimized
> binary compatible versions of blas and lapack libs. Currently it uses
> the somewhat ugly solution of creating separate atlas-sse, atlas-3dnow,
> and atlas-sse2 subpackages.

Can that be encapsulated by an i386 and an i686 build?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070613/3a743554/attachment.sig>