gprolog i386,i486,i586,i686 rpms?!?

[Quentin Spencer]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 11:49:56 Quentin Spencer wrote:
>   
>> The atlas package could benefit from this. It provides speed-optimized
>> binary compatible versions of blas and lapack libs. Currently it uses
>> the somewhat ugly solution of creating separate atlas-sse, atlas-3dnow,
>> and atlas-sse2 subpackages.
>>     
>
> Can that be encapsulated by an i386 and an i686 build?
>   

Well, no. I was hoping that the implication of this discussion was that 
other subarches, such as pentium4, were also supported.

Quentin