Script to determinate packages wich need comaintainership

[Bill Nottingham]

Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger at gmail.com) said: 
> A) cvs ACL system that understands groups.  c4chris sent a patch that
> should do this for the current code.  I'll take another look at this and
> apply it.  It shouldn't actually do anything until we do the rest of the
> steps.
> B) a new group who's acl allows them to checkout/connect to the cvs
> server but not commit.
> C) Modification to our acl generating scripts to output the group
> definitions and new acls based on them.  Something like:
> D) Upstream will need to have an account in the FAS. [*]_
> 
> 1:  [all packages] | [anyone] | deny
> 2:  [all packages] | @cvsadmin | allow
> 3:  [packages with no current policy] | @cvsextras | allow
> 4:  [packages with policy] | user1,user2,user3 | allow
> 
> Notice that this definition does not include the new group anywhere.  A
> user in the new group only gains access by being explicitly listed on a
> line like #4.

Will still fail without either filesystem level ACLs or permission
changes due to being unable to write to the rawh files. Unless I'm
misreading?

Bill