FESCo Meeting Summary for 2007-02-22

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:06:52PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:44:51PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > Axel Thimm wrote :
> > 
> > > > No news about the possible reverting of the MANDATORY build root tag?
> > > > It's still blocking a few of my submissions...

Rejoice, the proposal was voted on, was ratified by fesco and is now
written in the guidelines, so you can unblock your reviews.

> > > spot asked me to write something up and it will hopefully be voted on
> > > today:
> > > 
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot
> > > 
> > > Feel free to stop by on #fedora-packaging at 17:00 UTC to manipulate
> > > your favourite representative. :)
> > > 
> > > If it passes it will have to be ratified on Thursday by fesco, so if
> > > all go well, you'll be able to finish up those packages (me also).
> > 
> > Neat. Thanks. I've make a few corrections, slightly changed a few
> > biased sentences and added some minor details. Please check my changes,
> > and feel free to revert anything you wouldn't agree with.
> 
> Thanks, it all looks good, and I stand embarrassed of making so many
> typos in such little space ;)
> 
> I don't see any biased stuff changed, but maybe I didn't even notice
> the orginal wording was biased. For what it's worth the whole thing
> *is* biased otherwise it wouldn't start with
> 
>   "has been too much talk about this topic. This topic is not a rebel
>    topic. This topic is BuildRoot, Bloody BuildRoot" ;)





-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070306/6e305ec5/attachment.sig>