Fedora User Management (revisited)

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Thu Mar 8 23:27:42 UTC 2007


Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) said: 
>   
>> Or bite the bullet and reserve a new fixed uid range
>>     
>
> +100
>
> Just do it, have a registry. When we get to a situation that requires 500
> separate system UIDs, we'll deal with it then. I don't want to be
> the "640k should be enough for everyone" guy, but I'd have to think that
> by the time we get to that point, we will have gone way beyond the
> point of diminishing returns in additional packages.
>
> Bill
>
>   
Just so we do know the numbers:
$ repoquery --whatrequires '/usr/sbin/useradd' --qf='%{name}' | sort | 
uniq | wc -l
54
$ repoquery --whatrequires 'fedora-usermgmt' --qf='%{name}' | sort | 
uniq | wc -l
25

Total of 79.  This is actually fewer users then I thought and a larger 
adoption rate of fedora usermgmt then I thought.  Anywho, its not 640k 
:-D but that's our number

    -Mike




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list