Fedora User Management (revisited)
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Thu Mar 8 23:27:42 UTC 2007
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) said:
>
>> Or bite the bullet and reserve a new fixed uid range
>>
>
> +100
>
> Just do it, have a registry. When we get to a situation that requires 500
> separate system UIDs, we'll deal with it then. I don't want to be
> the "640k should be enough for everyone" guy, but I'd have to think that
> by the time we get to that point, we will have gone way beyond the
> point of diminishing returns in additional packages.
>
> Bill
>
>
Just so we do know the numbers:
$ repoquery --whatrequires '/usr/sbin/useradd' --qf='%{name}' | sort |
uniq | wc -l
54
$ repoquery --whatrequires 'fedora-usermgmt' --qf='%{name}' | sort |
uniq | wc -l
25
Total of 79. This is actually fewer users then I thought and a larger
adoption rate of fedora usermgmt then I thought. Anywho, its not 640k
:-D but that's our number
-Mike
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list