emacs and /etc/alternatives

Tom Lane tgl at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 04:05:47 UTC 2007


Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> writes:
> Or we just throw out the non-gui emacs and only ship the one that can do both

+1.  Building emacs without X support was pretty pointless a dozen years
ago, and it is far more so now.  What other packages do we build
multiple versions of to avoid pulling in dependencies?

			regards, tom lane




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list