Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Mike McGrath]

Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> writes:
>
>   
>>>> So it will have the same flaws like fedora-usermgmt
>>>>         
>>> About which flaws are you speaking?
>>>       
>> Please, repeating that you don't recognize any flaw is not making them
>> go away.
>>     
>
> Please, just because you do not recognize that the Flying Spaghetti
> Monster exists, it is not making it go away.
>
> Please, stop mentioning that there are flaws in fedora-usermgmt without
> naming them!
>
>   
You're joking right?  I don't want to get all ad-hominem here but 
multiple people have mentioned multiple issues / flaws and aside from a 
documentation mistype you basically told them "There is no flaw"  If 
there "is no flaw" why is this thread still going on?  Why does our 
downstream EPEL still not know what to do?  Do you really think Axel and 
I have made up issues in the software and implementation for our own 
amusement?  There are issues in the implementation please stop ignoring 
our message, we aren't stupid people quit treating us as such.

    -Mike