emacs and /etc/alternatives
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 17:33:12 UTC 2007
On Friday 09 March 2007 12:27:11 Chip Coldwell wrote:
> Then I suggested dropping the emacs-nox package.
>
> That met with strenous objections.
Where? I saw one objection.
You could also keep the emacs-nox package and just name it emacs-nox. If
you're purposefully setting up a box without X libs and with emacs-nox, you
probably are capable of running emacs-nox instead of 'emacs'.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070309/b61533a4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list