emacs and /etc/alternatives
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 18:05:20 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating writes:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 12:56:01 Chip Coldwell wrote:
> > I really don't understand the reaction alternatives is getting. Is it
> > really preferable to have every package create its own script, using its
> > own environment variables and its own priorities, than to use a common
> > infracstructure like alternatives? At least once the SA has learned
> > alternatives, he knows what to expect from the different packages that use
> > it.
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but isn't alternatives a sitewide thing, where
> preference for emacs vs emacs-nox might be a per user thing?
alternatives just provides a master symlink called "emacs" pointing to
emacs-foo, emacs-bar, and do on. You can still invoke emacs-foo and
emacs-bar directly.
Andrew.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list