emacs and /etc/alternatives
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 18:55:21 UTC 2007
John Dennis writes:
>
> To get us to a situation where there can be two versions of emacs (a
> reasonable goal) we have the following choices:
>
> * have a package which owns /usr/bin/emacs and install a script to start
> the preferred version. emacs and emacs-nox both require this package.
That's an OK solution.
> * use alternatives (yuck!), I don't think it's appropriate for this
> purpose and its just plain nasty, but it solves the file conflict
> problem.
That's an OK solution too.
Andrew.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list