emacs and /etc/alternatives

Carl Worth cworth at redhat.com
Sat Mar 10 00:32:31 UTC 2007


On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:17:40 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The user can set PREFERRED_EMACS to x or nox or kde or wx or whatever
> interfaces the future GNU emacs supports.  If its installed on this
> system, it'll be invoked, else the script falls back to looking for an
> emacs to run.
>
> If there were a multitude of options, you could even set your own
> fallback order.

And people have complained about /etc/alternatives as being "unclean"
somehow?

What possible benefit is there to re-inventing all of its
functionality on a package-by-package basis like this?

-Carl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070309/129833e3/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list