emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Simo Sorce]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:13 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:02:52PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > But, not very convincing ones. :)
> > > If having a fedora box without X installed but still functionnal is not 
> > > convincing I don't know where we are heading.
> > 
> > As mentioned, you don't need to have an X server installed. The argument for
> > saving the few megs of disk space used by the X libraries themselves *isn't*
> > convincing.
> 
> This is not an issue of space, but of having the choice not to install 
> the X libs.

What about the choice of not installing the glibc? 
Please can you provide me only statically compiled binaries ? :-)