Is referencing the GPL in the package's README enough of a "license"?
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva at redhat.com
Thu Mar 15 03:29:49 UTC 2007
On Mar 14, 2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 03:08 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 05:27 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> >> it's not enough for you to be allowed to distribute the program
>> >> without a copy of the GPL, because the GPL itself requires it to
>> >> be included.
> What are legal implications on rpm packagers when they add legal
> files?
If it adds something that the copyright holder demanded everyone who
distributes the program to add, you can't get it wrong as far as the
copyright holder is concerned, methinks. But IANAL ;-)
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list