Proposal: Automate fedora-maintainers subscriptions

[Christopher Stone]

On 3/20/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Warren Togami schrieb:
> > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThorstenLeemhuis/MailingListReorganization
> >> But I think it doesn't make to much sense to discuss that now -- I'd say
> >> we should discuss this again in detail when we are getting closer to
> >> actually realizing it (e.g. maybe four weeks from now; or after F7 is out).
> > I agree it is not a high priority to discuss this now, but please do not
> > assume there is widespread agreement to make these changes happen.
> > I believe this has been a case where silence != agreement.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00104.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00230.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-January/msg00104.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00732.html
>
> That are probably about 100 mails about the topic. And, as I wrote, I
> even got a "Looks very sane to me."
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00735.html
> -- I marked that day in my calendar ;-)
>
> But seems your don't like the plan that got worked out so far. That's
> fine. Feel free to work out something else.

I can speak on the behalf of the games SIG and hereby declare that the
fedora-games-list should stay.  Please take all references of
fedora-games-list off your mailing list reorg doc.

Thanks,
Christopher Stone
(on behalf of entire games SIG)