Proposal: Automate fedora-maintainers subscriptions

[Rahul Sundaram]

Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
>> Warren Togami schrieb:
>> > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> >> 
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThorstenLeemhuis/MailingListReorganization
>> >> But I think it doesn't make to much sense to discuss that now -- 
>> I'd say
>> >> we should discuss this again in detail when we are getting closer to
>> >> actually realizing it (e.g. maybe four weeks from now; or after F7 
>> is out).
>> > I agree it is not a high priority to discuss this now, but please do 
>> not
>> > assume there is widespread agreement to make these changes happen.
>> > I believe this has been a case where silence != agreement.
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00104.html 
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00230.html 
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-January/msg00104.html 
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00732.html 
>>
>>
>> That are probably about 100 mails about the topic. And, as I wrote, I
>> even got a "Looks very sane to me."
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00735.html 
>>
>> -- I marked that day in my calendar ;-)
>>
>> But seems your don't like the plan that got worked out so far. That's
>> fine. Feel free to work out something else.
> 
> I can speak on the behalf of the games SIG and hereby declare that the
> fedora-games-list should stay.  Please take all references of
> fedora-games-list off your mailing list reorg doc.

Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list?

Rahul