Proposal: Automate fedora-maintainers subscriptions

[Rahul Sundaram]

Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list?
> 
> For the same reason any SIG should have their own list.

That is not a good reason consider no SIG except games has its own 
mailing list.

    Rename the
> lists fedora-SIG-foo for all I care, but these lists should exist.
> Using something like [games] in message headers on fedora-maintainers
> or something is just going to get lost in all the noise.
> 
> Infact, while we are on the discussion, can we please add a
> fedora-SIG-PHP mailing list.

If it is packaging details it should be in fedora-packaging list. Other 
details could be in fedora-devel list. In other words what do you 
discuss in fedora-games list that doesnt fit into any existing other 
Fedora lists?

Every SIG creating their own lists would essentially reduce the 
visibility and participation of contributors and users.

Rahul