Role of SIG's

[Peter Gordon]

On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:05 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> I would actually consider PackageMaintainers as a SIG in itself.  It
> makes more sense to me to have /SIG/PackageMaintainers rather than
> /PackageMaintainers/SIGs

+1 from me. This makes more sense to me and continues along the already
in-place lines of having a bug-triaging squad, a documentation group,
translation group, etc.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ 
About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070320/aafe0165/attachment.sig>