Proposal: Automate fedora-maintainers subscriptions

[Denis Leroy]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Christopher Stone wrote:
>> On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>> Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list?
>>
>> For the same reason any SIG should have their own list.
> 
> That is not a good reason consider no SIG except games has its own 
> mailing list.
> 
> If it is packaging details it should be in fedora-packaging list. Other 
> details could be in fedora-devel list. In other words what do you 
> discuss in fedora-games list that doesnt fit into any existing other 
> Fedora lists?

To me the Games SIG is a fantastic example of a "SIG done right": a very 
dynamic and active group that essentially created their own 
sub-community. The smaller size makes it easier to define games-specific 
packaging standard, contributes to faster package reviews, and so on. I 
don't know about "should", but it seems to me if SIG members feel they 
need their own list, why not.